Abortion Funding Ban?

Boston Globe
WASHINGTON – Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state.

Abortion is a covered service for low-income Massachusetts women enrolled in subsidized insurance plans available since 2006 through the state’s landmark health care law.

But the bill that squeaked through the US House late Saturday would prohibit private insurance plans from covering abortion if they accept federal subsidies. It also bans abortion coverage in the new government insurance option.

Kudos if the bill does prohibit covering abortion, but the bill itself is a statist mess.

Obama Nazi Health Plan Girl @ BHCC!

I’m pretty damn sure that the “why do you continue to support a Nazi policy?” girl gave me a small magazine from the LaRouche Political Action Committee outside of the Community College train stop today. I was in a bit of a hurry and at first I didn’t recognize her or her cause. So I just took what she gave me and continued to walk. I look at it. And the cover page says “Act Now To Stop Obama’s Nazi Health Plan!” This is incendiary material! I’m going to read and see what exactly the problem is. I did a little research on LaRouche and found out that the PAC is named after Lyndon LaRouche, a long time Democrat who has run as a candidate for President in eight elections. He claims to have correctly predicted a number of events, including the terrorist attacks of September 11 and the October 1987 recession. His group the Larouche Movement has been deemed a political cult by many folk.

Obama Addressing Congress On Health Care

BarackObamaportrait

http://wersnews.com/2009/09/obama-addressing-congress-on-h.html

Light-Hearted Pic of Day!

“On What Planet Do You Spend Most Of Your Time?”

A dining room table would win an argument against you, Barney.

Elementary Ideas on Democracy

Changes come from the bottom, not the top. As everyone knows, Obama championed the vague concept of “change” to the American people throughout his campaign. And of course everyone ate it up because eight years of a right wing war criminal in office will do serious brain damage to you. So, people wanted a Democrat to fuck things up once again. Anyway, as history demonstrates major societal changes, such as severely kicking racism square in the pills (though it’s alive and well and still needs ass whooping)come through the struggles of everyday people and then the elites react to it. Your history and government textbooks want you to believe the opposite: the elitists, like the Supreme Court randomly decided to battle racism and end legal segregation in the South. Yes, it’s true that that wasn’t the top priority for the majority of America, but as Abbie Hoffman once stated, “You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.” Well, the black rights and civil rights activists, such as Richard Wright and Rosa Parks, and countless others were the “dissidents” and the American people were the “assimilated conformists.” In simple terms, democracy is everyone’s opportunity to participate and have a major influence in the political process. Not mob rule as school an TV have led you to believe. So, the very idea that Obama will clean up the mess of the Bush Administration and previous administrations through health care reform, abortion reform, etc. is absurd. The social ills affecting everyone, particularly the poverty stricken people he doesn’t care that much about, cannot be obliterated through reforms because reforms imply that the system is well intentioned and good, but needs some tidying up. WRONG! you never hear a politician say “we’re doing our best to reform rape” or “With our new program we plan to seriously reform child abuse.” Of course not! because we want to ABOLISH the evils of rape and child abuse. In short, we don’t need reforms, we need changes…. but don’t look to your pal Barry for that, look to one another and create some real dialogue.

Chris

National Health Care? No Thank You

 

…I do not want some government bureaucrat telling me what medical treatment I can or cannot receive.

It’s time for Congress to have the intestinal fortitude to say no to any additional government spending, no to national health care, and no to any additional interference in the free enterprise system. – Freep.com

 

Very true. Prices were on the d-l and “free” health care was more abundant when health care was run by the market. Oh yeah and HMOs really really need to be eliminated.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 190 other followers